Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to know how to improve this highly important article.
Thanks, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 17:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @RoySmith and Vanamonde93: Pinging the two main reviewers of my last FAC. I took your advice and will be stepping away from narwhal for a little while. In the meantime, I've taken it upon myself to really work on this article. What are your thoughts? FA-level? Or in need of more work? I'd appreciate reviews below. Regards, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 21:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I'll be waiting for a maximum of 2 months for a response. I'm in no rush to get this article to FA-status. In the meantime, I'll be dropping at WP:Guild of copy editors. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 10:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I think the "Interspecific predatory relationships" could use some trimming. I don't think interactions with smaller predators like wolverines and eagles is that important. One record of a golden eagle eating a cub is trivial, just like the line about a dead polar bear cub in a brown bear den. I suggest sticking to their main enemies and how they interact ecologically. The lines on polar bears could be rewritten using this as a source. LittleJerry (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)