Wikipedia:Peer review/Cambridge Union/archive1

The Cambridge Union

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has been transferred over following a name change and has lost its previous reviews. The article has also been worked on substantially from different sources.

Thanks, Om285 (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checking it User:Om285, the issues I find are:

Four citations in the lead section. If you are citing controversial info, I'd recommend you to change to something more general or indirect.
The third paragraph of modern developments lack citations.
2016 development project has two one-sentence paragraphs. Try expanding or combine them. In past speakers and debates there is a link to an official website. That might fit better in sections like further reading, see also or external links.
Some citations are also lacking formatting.

I hoped this helped. Good luck with the article. Also I made my own peer review here so I would appreciate feedback. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]