| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I brought this article to GA about a year ago, where reviewer Thebiguglyalien suggested that it may be a suitable candidate for FA status. The article has remained relatively stable in the time since that review, so I wanted to put the article before a larger audience of editors to identify any potential deficiencies, and get a temperature check on whether it is ready to undergo the FAC process. Thanks in advance for any input you're able to provide. Morgan695 (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I have added this article to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar. Please consider reviewing other articles listed there. Z1720 (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)