| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
Given the article has an active community of contributors, it may be interest to fellow editors in working to solicit a compendium of feedback on how to further advance the article, perhaps with a long term end goal of reinstating this page with the criteria required of reassessment for a'Good Article.'
Being part of the discussion which imposed the maintenance template, it should be a goal to flesh out the verifiability of this page, which is at a deficit in its current state.
Discussion on the topographical features, of which scholarship is rather plentiful, is sparse on this page. My personal suggestion is to establish a decent synthesis between this page and the already extant pages on said topographical features of the cities such as monuments and buildings, though I am still unsure whether some sort of index or a map may be more relevant to making that project navigable. A long term question may be a discussion on what topics deserve to be split off for their own pages, but the page may need to be more expanded for that to be relevant.
Thanks, Sleath56 (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)