Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch articleWatch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because… we feel like we have improved the article by far from the shabby mess it was months ago. Despite being a somewhat obscure subject, there are many people interested in the subject, and the article is improved beyond what I even thought possible for this level of obscurity. Any tips, assessment, ect, which will help us get this article as good quality and high listed as possible will help.


Thanks,

User:Radman622 20:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]