| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
It went through a Peer Review years ago, and then a failed FAC. Well I'm back to try and push it through FAC again, but want to make sure its up to the higher standards that are required for FA these days. The biggest concern would be the writing style itself, which was the most noted issue way back when, but anything to improve it is welcome. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)