A controversial subject related to Scientology. Following a recent rewrite, the article is looking much healthier and much better referenced, with 80 footnotes (!). I'd like to get it up to Featured Article status in due course. It would be very helpful if anyone could take a look and see whether there are any issues that need to be addressed. -- ChrisO 23:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks pretty good to me; thorough and reasonably balanced. But I was a little unpleasantly surprised to see Campbell, Williamson and Van Vogt mixed up with that stuff. — RJH 23:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]