Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
Thanks, Davejsimonson (talk) 18:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your willingness to do a peer review on this article. I am asking for advice on how I can improve this article from its current C-class status to B or maybe even GA. If the article is missing important information or if there is irrelevant information to remove, I would be interested to know. I believe the article was given the C-class grade before I made major modification and added sources, so any advice would be gratefully accepted and acted on.