Wikipedia:Peer review/Doraemon/archive1

Doraemon

I've listed this article for peer review because… back in June 2021, I expanded the Doraemon article largely and brought it from a C-class to good article status, and further changes have been made since then. Now I'm willing to get input on how it could improve further, and whether it have a considerable chance for featured status or not.

Thanks, Thuyhung2112 (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I won't make specific comments since I've never done an actual FC review, nor do I have the time to read through the entire article, but I do think it stands a chance as is given. It seems pretty well-researched and not too overabundant with information. The only minor fixes I'd recommend are, I guess, things regarding grammar, i.e., I'd change "toys, food, stationery, action figures, gashapon, shoes and clothing, among others" to 'toys, food, stationery, action figures, gashapon, shoes, clothing, and other items.' I think it flows better this way, and there's a few other minor instances like that, but not really too big of a deal. But overall, yeah, I think there's a solid chance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcataclysmal (talk • contribs) 11:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sarcataclysmal: I've done that (sorry for late reply); and you forgot to sign your comment with four tildes (i.e. ~~~~), but never mind. Thuyhung2112 (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I forgot I even replied to this not gonna lie, it was very late at night, all good tho. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Thuyhung2112 There is currently a banner on the article suggesting it could be expanded from Japanese. I'm guessing that the article is already comprehensive according to the FA criteria, in which case the banner should be removed. If there are important aspects missing, of course it is not suitable for FAC. (t · c) buidhe 02:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Re Buidhe: I looked at the Japanese article and it's been tagged for "multiple issues" (sourcing and OR) since 2019. From what I see only "Doraemon Long Stories" was worth adding (which I have done); otherwise many sections were either already covered in the English version, or completely inadequate. Thuyhung2112 (talk) 03:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Through a quick look, the article has good sources and coverage but I'd suggest to reduce the amount of quotes in reception. Also the scene of Doraemon's first apperance does not seem that important unless I missed something. Instead I would suggest posting an image of the main cast.Tintor2 (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah it's pretty comprehensive. I also suggest you can work on adding image alts for the media used on the page; that will be useful for FAC image review.--ZKang123 (talk) 08:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

@Thuyhung2112: It has been over a month since the last comment here. Are you still interested in receiving feedback, or is this ready for FAC? Z1720 (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

No response from the above ping, so I am going to close this PR. Z1720 (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)