| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I expanded the article and believe it should be rated above stub class.
Thanks, Cstickel(byu) (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Cstickel(byu) I agree. I have literally nothing to add to this. It is very well-written from both an encyclopedic and a lay point of view and well cited. It's very similar in structure to similar articles. I have rated it C class but think it could even be nominated for good article status if you desired. Great work!
- ps. if you have time could you please pick another article on the WP:PRWAITING list and review it? Anyone is welcome to review and fresh eyes are always welcome. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)