This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because its just been assessed as being a high B, and would like to know what can be done to bring it up to GA standard, and eventually make it a FA Thanks, Pedro J. the rookie 20:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: It looks like a lot of work has been done here. However, a Peer Review rule is that articles must be free of major cleanup banners. This aricle has a banner from May 2009, indicating lack of citations in the Music and music video section. Also:
- There are several "fact" tags within the text, and other parts which are almost devoid of citations. For example, the last paragraph of the Settings section has none.
- Images: The caption to the photograph of the cast appears to be a "deletion pending" notice. The other mages are all copyrighted and subject to non-free use rationales. Some of these rationales seem very weak - have you spoken to someone knowledgeable in this field who can advise you on this?
- THe lead needs to be expanded into a full summary of the article, per WP:LEAD
The article cannot be properly reviewed until the citation problem is resolved. I suggest you close the review and re-present the article when the major problem has been dealt with. Brianboulton (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- Brianboulton (talk) has summed up the PR position perfectly. As it stands a high B rating is fair, and the citation and image problems certainly needs to be addressed before any progress can be made on review. Best wishes. Bob (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I've listed this article for peer review because its just been assessed as being a high B, and would like to know what can be done to bring it up to GA standard, and eventually make it a FA Thanks, Pedro J. the rookie 20:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)