| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has undergone some comprehensive edits and the quality has definitely improved.
Thanks, The lorax (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I'll run through a few thing I noticed with the article.
- The lead need expanding. It's meant to be an overview of the whole article, currently it only really covers the story.
- Is there any information around regarding the cast or the casting process? It would be nice to flesh that out if possible so it's not just a list
- Art Institute of Chicago section seems to be pretty much made up of quotes
- Music heading would be better off as a subheading of Production rather than it's own main heading
- Reception and Cultural Impact should all go under a "Release" Heading. DVD releases + TV series I think should be merged into an Beyond Theatrical release subhead of the new Release heading
- The critique section seems a little quote heavy as well. Try to pick out defining sections of reviews and compare them with others.
- All images need descriptive alt text
Hope that helps. CrimsonFox talk 09:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)