Wikipedia:Peer review/Five Themes of Geography/archive1

Five Themes of Geography

I created this article over the course of 3 hours using information from my History textbook. It's cited, NPOV, formatted well, wikified, and it uses good Commons images. Its only weak point (which isn't really that weak) is its length. Tell me what you think. ~ Flame vip e r 22:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a few comments:

I think the article should be renamed to "Five themes of geography", see WP:NAME: Convention: Do not capitalize second and subsequent words unless the title is a proper noun.
There are no inline citations, the information in the article should be verifiable. (WP:CITE)
The hatnotes at the top are unnecessary (WP:HAT), move the links to a "see also" section or add them on the article.
I think the length of the lead section is OK, but the title of the article should be named in the first sentence. (WP:LEAD)
There are a lot of words linked, for example, in the place section:

Place is a description of the characteristics that make a certain location distinct.

Remove some of those unnecessary self links, I can't find the guideline right now, I'll search for it later.

Hope I helped. Cheers. No-Bullet (Talk • Contribs) 07:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the last suggestion, I think he's thinking of WP:CONTEXT. Rigadoun (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 21:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]