Wikipedia:Peer review/Ford Mustang SSP/archive1

Ford Mustang SSP

The article has a solid ammount of info, and with exception of the Law Enforcement users (Some states need to have their respective Law Enforcement agencies listed and concern that the excessive ammount of red links might be a detracting point) I feel that the article is more of a general overview than a proper encyclopedia page. --293.xx.xxx.xx 23:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.

Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.

Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.

~~Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links~~.

~~The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information~~.

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 23:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- All the points are covered, with exception of "the" header remark and categories. --293.xx.xxx.xx 00:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To respond, I would probably have to make manual suggestions; I could probably force the javascript to give slightly more specific problems, but not much more than that. My original goal with this was to provide basic suggestions for articles that have a smaller notability and hence tend to receive less reviews, giving the submitters something to work on first while waiting for more in-depth responses. However, I appreciate your advice and will work to try to make it more focused on certain problems. Some more suggestions:

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

This article may be a bit list-weighty; in other words, some of the lists should be converted to prose (paragraph form).

There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.
Thanks for the feedback- Andy _t 00:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For the lists, should I just redirect into another article?--293.xx.xxx.xx 01:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, second go around. Added somemore info. Come on, roast my editing skills!!--293.xx.xxx.xx 05:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]