Wikipedia:Peer review/Friendshoring/archive1

Friendshoring

I've listed this article for peer review because its a very new concept and recently coined.

Thanks, RPSkokie (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

@Ancheta Wis Since you have contributed to expanding the following article: Joint All-Domain Command and Control. Could you help me with this article as well? RPSkokie (talk) 05:47, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello RPSkokie, I had a look at the article and a few things caught my eye:

• The article is very short. It could be expanded in various ways. Some paragraphs or sections about the following topics could be added:
  • What are the motives for friendshoring?
  • What are its (economic/political/other) consequences/advantages/disadvantages?
  • Is friendshoring important? Are many countries doing it? Does it have a big impact on their economy, on the global economy, or on specific economic sectors?
  • Some more details about concrete examples.
  • How are the terms "onshoring" and "nearshoring" defined? How are they similar to friendshoring and in what respects is friendshoring different?
• I think the first sentence should only define the term. Something like Friendshoring or Allyshoring is the practice of relocating supply chains to allies and friendly countries. The next sentence can mention the relation to onshoring and nearshoring but the reader first wants to know what it is.
• In contrast, global supply chains have been thrown into disarray due to Russia's Invasion of ukraine.: "ukraine" should be uppercase. And why does the sentence start with "In contrast"? Aren't both sentences about supply chain interruptions?
• The first sentence defines the concept, the second sentence talks about geopolitics and risk assessment, and the following two sentences give examples of supply chain interruptions. These ideas are all related but I'm not sure that the average reader is aware of these relations. Maybe they could be spelled out in more detail.
• Reference 5: don't use all uppercase for the title.
• WP:EARWIG shows two potential copyright violations with https://chahalacademy.com/daily-current-affairs/21-Nov-2022/707 and https://optimizeias.com/daily-prelims-notes-22-november-2022/. You should check you copied from whom there. They claim that their texts are from 21st and 22nd November 2022. When were the corresponding passages added to our article?
• User:Headbomb/unreliable shows no unreliable sources.

I hope these comments were helpful. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

@Phlsph7 Many, many thanks for providing such a comprehensive review. On November 18 and 19, we added the matching texts to the corresponding passages of our article. Is it still considered a copyright infringement? RPSkokie (talk) 12:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

It's copyright infringement but not on our part since the text was first published here. If they want to use text from Wikipedia, they have to explicitly state that the text came from here. So as far as our article is concerned, I don't think there are any problems. Phlsph7 (talk) 13:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)