Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this contains detailed information on a prolific yet hitherto little-known Renaissance sculptor, and the original Italian article from which it has been translated has been rated 'good'.
I would in particular welcome
- a review of the translation itself.
- any suggestions for improvement, additional information, available images.
Thanks, Feanor0 (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments from Csisc
editI would first thank you for the work you have done for Gasparo Cairano. However, I do not think that working on Italian Work is sufficient for this work. I think personally that consulting French Wikipedia for example for further information can make a very influencing difference. However, translation cannot be sufficient of such works... More information should be afforded in order to get better work about Gasparo Cairano
- Biography: I think personally that the work had succeeded to give an overview about the huge lack of information about the artist. However, it could be bettered by specifying the close relationship between him and ssome rich and famous families...
- Arts: The work has succeeded to describe all the artistic works that Gasparo Cairano had done with some description... However, it has not benefited from the works in Italian Wikipedia: Itinerario critico di Gasparo Cairano and Opere di Gasparo Cairano. These works can give further and useful information about the Italian Artist such as the circumstances in which the works had been done and the reaction of the artistic audience towards his artistic works...
- Posthumous Impact: The work lacked a lot from a brief but concise description of the impact towards the death of Gasparo Cairano, the place in which he was burried... The Honours he received after his death and some quotes from famous people born after his death can be a good advance in this work...
- Social Influence: The precise description of the Social Infuence of Gasparo Cairano such as quotes or ceremonies about him can constitute an exceptional amelioration to this excellent work.
Finally, I would like to thank you again for the work you have already done. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 11:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)