| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
The article is current listed as a Good Article. I am wondering whether it can be successful in an FA review.
Thanks, William S. Saturn (talk) 06:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- I took a quick glance at the sources in the article. I'm not familiar with The Lantern or Politics1. What makes them pass WP:V? --haha169 (talk) 21:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- The Lantern is the newspaper for Ohio State University. Politics1 is a well respected political directory.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- If you say so. Mr. Amondson had nothing to do with Ohio or Ohio State, and I am not familiar with Wikipedia policy regarding student newspapers. Better double-check that. As for Politics1, I still find using it an iffy-proposition; but if you think it will withstand FAC challenges, go for it. Best of luck! --haha169 (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- If the Politics1 source was removed, I don't think it would do too much damage to the article, and could probably be replaced with Amondson's own website.--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- If you say so. Mr. Amondson had nothing to do with Ohio or Ohio State, and I am not familiar with Wikipedia policy regarding student newspapers. Better double-check that. As for Politics1, I still find using it an iffy-proposition; but if you think it will withstand FAC challenges, go for it. Best of luck! --haha169 (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- The Lantern is the newspaper for Ohio State University. Politics1 is a well respected political directory.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)