Wikipedia:Peer review/Girly Edition/archive1

Girly Edition

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to have someone else's opinion on how to improve this article in case I'd like to nominate it for FAC some day. Thanks, ✗iℎi✗(talk) 00:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First time commenting on a review, so I hope I am doing this right. So, basically, the title seems to me to be a punning reference to Early Edition. Perhaps this should be mentioned in the article in some manner? Waltham, The Duke of 14:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would, but there's no sources that back that up. ✗iℎi✗(talk) 21:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Right. I keep forgetting that. Thankfully for all, I never add content to articles (I mostly identify myself as a WikiGnome). Pity though; to me the connection is plain obvious.
    PS: Your signature needs fixing. Unless the three squares were placed there on purpose. Waltham, The Duke of 11:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 12:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]