| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for a peer review because i'm convinced it can reach FA status. However, i feel the article still needs a lot of work done. Some of the sections in the article, such as history, culture and community, geography and landmarks, go into too much detail. There is also still an overly enthusiastic tone to the article as well. Both of these issues have been brought up in previous peer reviews.
Overall, the article is really strong with appropriate citations and some very good pictures
Thanks, Kilnburn (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)