| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…this is a huge article, and since it is a B-class, I'm surprised nobody has requested a peer review; I think that just by cutting some stuff in the article down/out, it could become an everyday good article, and there are plenty of sources, and a little more work on the lead
Thanks, SCB '92 (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Comments by User:Tintor2 Some things I have noted are:
- The lead is very short, using small paragraphs. See WP:Lead.
Done
- Most of the gameplay section is unsourced.
Done
- The plot could be trimmed down considering that as far as I see in the section it "Kratos fight this" various times.
- The reception section also needs organizing. It only says "IGN says (quote), GameSpot says (quote), etc." Paraprashing is required.
Done
- Some references need to have worked into to include parameters like publisher, author, date, etc. instead of bare urls.
Done
- There are a lot of one-sentece paragraphs and such things are not approved by the manual of style.
Done
I recommend using GAs or FAs as an example to follow like Resident Evil 2, Terra Nova: Strike Force Centauri. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)