Yes, I know this has been peer reviewed before. However, the article's changed a lot since it was last reviewed, and I feel that it would benefit from another peer review.
Thanks,
şœśэїŝәқιￆṱᾅἻқￂ 05:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 13:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
First Impressions:
Section Issues:
- The "Environmental record" title sounds a little POV and the section is too short. Maybe that section and Google.org" can be worked into a more general section to balance out the "Criticism" part.
- The "Criticism" part is a pretty good length. I would say tad bit more on the censorship part, though.
- The "Google.mobi" section I would move under the "Growth" section.
- More main headers (too much under "History" - "Growth" may work)
Contrent:
- Needs more about the search engine. I know it has it's own page, but that's mainly what the company's know for.
- Needs more on AdSense/AdWords and the advertising side in general.
- Something should be said about Google's partnership with Mozilla.
- Google video - YouTube connection?
- A few more images in the middle would be nice.
- No reason is given for "Another trademark concern is about Google's Gmail in the UK and several other countries."
Style:
- Inconsistent formats "USD100,000" and "$1.67 billion"
- IPO is used a few times before it's linked, some might not know what that is
- "Acquisitions" needs to flow better - not so choppy.