| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it was recently demoted from FA status: as a big fan of the song, I'm keen to get it re-promoted, and I've been going through a complete overhaul of the references, one of the major concerns – an astonishing number of which were dead. However, it has noted on many occasions throughout the demoting that the prose needed work – and, never having written to a featured standard before, I'm not sure where to start. A peer review explaining how any aspect of the article could be improved, whether it be the prose, general formatting or reference, would be extremely helpful.
Note: Please note that I was not involved in the song's original FA promotion: I hadn't even joined Wikipedia back in 2007.
Thanks, I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 21:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)