I've been doing a lot of work on this article recently, it's currently at GAN and am wondering what else needs doing for a crack at FAC. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 12:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Matty, here you go, my usual tirade of trivia...

I'm about half way through, and I think most of the issues I've come up with are related to the article needing a good copyedit. I suggest you head over to WP:LOCE and place a request. Hope these comments have been useful, if you'd like me to continue reviewing (from 59-80 onwards) then give me a shout. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) - Part Deux.

Okay, onwards...

That's about it. Good luck with it, wherever you take it from now on! One thing worth considering is a graph of league finishes. That we get a good illustration of all the re-elections and bouncing around near the bottom of the Football League. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of quick points at a first cursory glance (all relate to the lead):

  • was formed in 1922, and were elected - either refer to the club as singular or plural, but not both in the same sentence
  • The following season saw another play-off appearance, but were beaten by Stockport County in the semi-final - grammatically incorrect - should read "York were beaten"
  • Also, the penultimate sentence of the lead uses "the club were" (plural) but then the very next sentence uses "the club remains" (singular). It seems a bit unclear whether British English users should refer to "the club" in the singular or the plural, but whichever you choose should be consistently applied....

ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]