Wikipedia:Peer review/Hollaback Girl/archive4

Hollaback Girl

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has had a tumultuous history with GAs, FAs, and PRs. I have recently been improving this article and would like to see how far away it is from a good article, as I also wish to restore the good topic Love. Angel. Music. Baby.

Thanks in advance to whoever takes this up, Thatone~~weird~~wikier | Say hi 18:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the infobox as per template guidance (easier than listing here). —Ojorojo (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Do you see any other problems with the article? Thatone~~weird~~wikier | Say hi 15:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has quite a FA & GA history. There's a lot to take in and probably should have an expert or two to comment. Sometimes the Guild of Copy Editors is helpful. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Funnily enough, I happen to be a GOCE member. I'll probably take a thorough look through the article soon. Thatone~~weird~~wikier | Say hi 17:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done (should have probably added that earlier). Anything else that needs work? Thatone~~weird~~wikier | Say hi 16:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, considering the inactivity, I am going to end this peer review and take this article to GAN. User:Thatone~~weird~~wikier | Oh, Toodles! 10:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]