Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Charley/archive1
This article is currently a GA, and I would like suggestions for how to take it to FA status. Any and all suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks very much. Regards, Keilana 23:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like to see some more organization for the Florida section. The aftermath is rather short, and it is mostly just one long quote. FEMA has plenty of info on it. --Hurricanehink (talk) 00:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Impact for Florida works too. Links like [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] need to be analyzed and summarized. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 05:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 19:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know what else to do to it. Juliancolton (talk) 14:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, now can i put it on FAC? Juliancolton (talk) 18:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- I would recommend not to do so. The Florida section is still disorganized, there are some citations missing, and the aftermath is poorly organized. --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)