Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Felix (1995)/archive1

The article is one of the Good Article Collaborations. Some suggestions on how the article could be improved would be apprciated. Tarret 16:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts:
  • "The large size of the hurricane, potential for re-strengthening, and slow forward motion, the worst case scenario of 7 to 9 feet would cause wide-spread flooding throughout southeastern Virginia." This is not a sentence.
  • That the hurricane was not as severe as originally feared could be made more explicit.
  • Some stubby subsections under "Impact".
  • Some of the wording under "Aftermath" is unclear. And does "Lack of Retirement" really need its own section?
Good luck. -- bcasterlinetalk 16:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]