Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has undergone a lot of work since the last time it was a Featured Article, and it's far more comprehensive, more meticulously cited and devoid (once again) of POV. Naturally, the preceding statement represents my POV and I need fresh eyes. xD
Thanks, —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 09:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- … and, nothing… xD —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 05:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)