Pretty good article with some references, but the criticism section needs expanding. This could easily get to FA or at least good with some work. Any specific suggestions would be much appreciated; I'm new to peer reviews. Simpsnut14 22:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks pretty decent. A few comments:
  • In the third paragraph, please clarify that by "XX" you mean a numerical identifier. Otherwise a reader foreign to the U.S. might take that text literally.
  • "Most long-distance journeys of less than 300 miles (500 km), whether for vacation or business, use the interstate highway system at some point." Do you have a source for this?
  • The last sentence, second paragraph of the "History" section has some italicized text. Could you start the sentence with "The publication" so that it is clear from the start that this refers to a publication, rather than emphasizing the text?
  • Typo: "transportaion"
  • It is usually requested that the trivia section be worked into the main text or dropped.
Thanks! — RJH (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per WP:LEAD. Please ensure that the lead adequately summarizes the article.
  • Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked (Don't link September or Tuesday unless there is really good reason to). Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.
  • Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • I advocate metric conversions to round numbers in articles like this one. An example of numbers that are not round: "70 to 80 mph (112 km/h to 129 km/h) speed limits." This could be rounded at least to 110 to 130, and other speeds similarly. I don't take the purpose of the article to give legal advice ("you may legally travel 130 km/hr") but rather to give readers who drive highways with metric signs the nearest equivalent that they might encounter (they're unlikely to find a sign that says "Speed Limit 112 km/hr"). Of course, where original numbers have more digits (e.g. 36 inches), it makes sense for metric equivalents to have a similar number of digits. Fg2 15:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • As said above, this article needs attention to dates and units. This can be done quickly, simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. This will give you a 'Dates' tab. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps. bobblewik 17:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments from a quick read:

  • It needs a lot more history - I should be able to help with this.
  • The bit about exit numbers really shouldn't be here, as most states number exits on all freeways.
  • Make sure Interstate Highway is always capitalized - an interstate highway is simply a highway in multiple states.
  • The trivia could be incorporated easily in the other sections.
  • The criticism section could be expanded and rescoped to cover its effects - positive and negative.
  • See also could be trimmed a bit.

Of course many of these are rather simple to fix, and I could just as easily {{sofixit}}.

Mind commenting on Wikipedia:Peer review/United States Numbered Highways/archive1? --SPUI (T - C) 18:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]