| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has the potential to become a GA. I know i haven't really contributed to the article, but the citations look pretty good except for a few dead links, and the article 's prose looks good too.
Thanks, Matthewishere0 (talk) 18:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Matthewishere0 looks like a month since you've posted this. I've had a brief look at your article and think it might be better if you just go directly to get a GA review, it doesn't seem to have any striking issues that stand out at this point. Make sure you ping any significant past contributors if you haven't done that much yourself, in case they want to be involved too. Good luck! --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 | This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck! |