| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
We are working towards GA status for this article. There have been major changes since the last review and it would be very helpful to see where we stand now.
Thanks, Thparkth (talk) 22:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comments by Jappalang
- Dablinks (toolbox on the right of this page) shows a disambiguation link; please fix it.
- Checklinks show two dead links; please fix them.
- Most of the structure seems good, but some parts seem repetitive (the founding of Boulton and Watt is mentioned twice).
- Many paragraphs of this article are not cited to sources. This failing makes it pointless to continue reviewing (the content might be incorrect or unfounded).
The serious lack of citations would cause the article to fail straightaway at GAN or FAC, so this must be rectified before any review or assessment can commence. Jappalang (talk) 07:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)