| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because the article is expanded, there are more images, and most important of all, the sourcing is improved. Please evaluate it against a B-checklist and suggest preparations for a GA review. What needs to be culled? What needs elaboration? Can the organization be improved? Thanks, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)