The article is suprisingly comprehensive and there are not POV tags(suprisingly). It is well sourced, so I'm posting it here to see how it could reach FAC. Newbie222 02:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
First off this would be amazing to get as a FA and would get you kudos from everyone here :). Anyway, here are some structure issues:
- One sentence paragraph in opening... for the lead try to have three long paragraphs here instead of the several splintered ones - see WP:LEAD
- "Religious perspectives" - section could use an intro
- "Christianity" - several one-sentence paragraphs here. In general this is quite long compared to the other subsections of "Religous perspectives", I'd try to keep them all around the same length
- "Islam" - kill the list here and make it into prose... no need for it :)
- "Ahmadiyya Movement" - One sentence paragraph
- "Hinduism" - two one sentence paragraphs - both too short
- "Judaism" - again, no need for a list here
- "Other perspectives" - one sentence paragraphs, several too short. This can be difficult because of the subject matter, however
- "Life and teachings" - generally uneven paragraphs - some too long, some even veer on being too long (although the shorts are the real issue)
- " Names and titles" and " Cultural and historical background" some paragraphs too short
- "Relics" - too short in general - consider making it a subsection someplace else or something
- " Interpretations of Jesus" - this sounds like something that belongs in see also - if you want to describe these I'd try to do it with actual prose...
- "Sources and further reading" - you need to seperate the sources from the further reading :)
- "See also" needs to be sorted - see Autism#See also for an example.
- "External links" - link farm alert!!! You should generally shoot for around 15 links for FAs
Ryan Norton T | @ | C 15:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input! Newbie222 00:30, 6 October 2005 (UTC)