Wikipedia:Peer review/Jews in Hong Kong/archive1

Jews in Hong Kong

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I'm trying to get this article to FA and it's already failed FAC twice (due to low participation). I can't think of any other ways to improve it beyond what it is now.

Thanks, — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 07:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template.

Since you are still working towards your first successful FAC, I suggest that you seek a mentor, who can help provide feedback on the article, and post on various applicable Wikiprojects asking for help. I also suggest that you review FACs right now: this will allow you to get to know the FAC process and criteria, as well as build confidence among the FAC community that you understand the criteria. Many FAC reviewers, myself included, prioritize reviewing articles from nominators with high review-to-nomination ratios. Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query by Z1720

@Golden: this PR has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? If so, I suggest posting a request on Wikiprojects attached to this article, asking for reviewers. If you are no longer requesting comments, can you close this PR? Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try posting on relevant WPs to see if that gains any attention. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 15:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I'm afraid I won't have much time for Wikipedia for the next few months. Therefore, I believe it would be best if you close this peer review until I am able to be spare more time on this. Cheers. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 17:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by GordonGlottal

Great job on this article. I'm concerned that some elements rely on your own interpretation or synthesis of sources, including the list of modern significant members of the Jewish community of Hong Kong and of 20th century most prominent representatives of the Jewish community in Hong Kong. I do think this information is valuable and so possibly should be left as is, but it's a technical issue for FAC. Such are the trade-offs. "The thesis about the absence of antisemitism in Hong Kong is common" is awkward and should be rephrased. When entire sections rely on one source (I'm thinking particularly of Antisemitism but there may be others) it would be better to attribute the analysis. Again, great job here, and thank you for your work. GordonGlottal (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Golden: to ensure that they saw the above. Z1720 (talk) 23:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had not. Thanks for the ping, Z1720. @GordonGlottal: Thank you for the review! I'll address your concerns/recommendations as soon as I can. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 09:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]