Wikipedia:Peer review/Jimi Hendrix/archive1
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 162.138.176.51 (talk • contribs) . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zigthis (talk • contribs) .
- I think that more WP:FOOTNOTEs would be helpful. Also, the ToC is way too large, and should be shortened a bit. The ordering should be fixed up; for example, "Drug use" comes way after "Death". Please also alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links. Thanks, AndyZ t 20:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- The article seems very well written, though I must agree with AndyZ. Some of the categories could be broken down into each other to shorten the table of contents. Some of them also need to be re-ordered. My biggest issue, though, is that for an article of such a massive size, there are not nearly enough references/footnotes. Also, even as a Hendrix fan myself, I can see that this article is in need of some neutral point-of-view rewriting in some sections, such as Impact. ♠ SG →Talk 23:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- The article looks extremely well written, there's depth and insight into his life and there hasn't been review into this article for a long time. This article really needs to be a FA, especially since it's about someone of such caliber as Jimi.
- FWIW, I've been researching the subject and editing the article in earnest since November 2012 and I intend to take the article to FAC by the end of this year. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 22:05, 13 July 2013 (UTC)