| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for FAC fairly soon. It was last nominated in Feb 2015 (nine years ago) and it appears to have matured significantly since then. I'd like to canvas opinion on anything that needs working on and I can address that in my own time, without being constrained by the time pressures of FA coordinators! I did a pretty thorough copyedit last year, which addresses one of the concerns of the previous FAC review. I can check for unsourced statements and either verify or remove them.
Thanks, Rodney Baggins (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)