- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I want to know what needs to be done, so the article can become an FA.
Thanks, -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments by Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Background
There must be sentence missing. Why was Mysterio disqualified?How did JBL win the FF4?Scott Garland needed parenthesis.Explain what a Handicap match is.Bad guy > villain, sounds more professional.
- Preliminary matches
Last names can be used after the full ring name is mentioned. Having them there again after the first time is unnecessary clutter.Explain Angle slam.
The rest of it looks fine to me.
- Done and thank you for the comments. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)
- You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC. The sourcing looks good.
- Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 16:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)