Wikipedia:Peer review/Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/archive1
I have requested a peer review due to this article being greater than the 20kb suggested by the GA nominations process. This article has become mostly stable as of late and, although details are being added and some minor alterations occur, is well written, contains a multihood of referenced information, and could honestly benefit from this process. Kyaa the Catlord 16:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I note that an RfC has been open on the article — regarding the issue of images and image-placement — since 03 February, 2006. The issue remains, and has recently led to a dispute over the article's GA nomination. — JEREMY 17:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I further note that this RFC had precisely 0 responses. Sigh. Kyaa the Catlord 17:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)