Wikipedia:Peer review/Kengir uprising/archive1

Kengir uprising

Hi. This is a new article, created within the last week or so almost wholly by myself, and I'd like to have some outside opinion on its merits, or lack of, both so that the article itself can be made as good as possible (and can maybe be brought up to FA status), and so that I can take this opportunity to learn from my mistakes and pass the experience on to all of my future edits and writing. Thanks in advance, all comments are greatly appreciated! --Clngre 20:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wow great job! I do not have time now to read the article, but a few things stand out just glacing at it. First you relie a lot on Solzhenitsyn. And while it is 100% OK to use him as a source it would be nice if you could find a greater variety of sources. Also I notice that you used a few blockquotes. That is also fine, but consider some of the points made in Wikipedia:Quotations#When to use quotations; perhaps prose would be better. I am sorry if this is a bit rude, but I am just surprise that you can write some much in so little time, but does any of it have any copyright problems? Again, great job.Jon513 07:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, jon! Thanks for your comments, I take them seriously. Let me go through them now:

I too am uncomfortable with the fact that I end up relying so much on Solzhenitsyn, but unfortunately my hands are kind of tied on that. The uprising does not have much written about it in english and Solzhenitsyn's account is one of the only major things on it. Anecdotally, from my search of Google print I've found tens of books where the uprising is mentioned, but they almost all use Solzhenitsyn as their source as well. I found a few websites that have some information on the uprising, too, but a lot of it is really suspect and some of it impossible (claims about something happening years before it even could have). But I have also found a number of news articles or book reviews that are fairly authoritative and that I've tried to incorporate. In any case, I was just now thinking of going to the talk page of the user that originally created the page based on a Ukranian-lanaguage book(s) and asking him to double check the article and correct whatever needs to be corrected.
Yes, the blockquotes are unusual and I'm not so sure about them. I do believe in using some of those quotes to help illustrate the point that is being made, but I don't really know wikipedia's policy on this and if the blockquotes that are there now are so apt. I initially just started to use them to help kind of "break-up" the big blocks of text because there are so few images from gulags, and absolutely none from Kengir that I'm aware of. Should I use it more sparingly or not at all? I'd glady accomodate either.
haha, no it's all written by myself (except the sourced quotations, of course). Thats a vaguely flattering question, actually. I'm just in my summer off before school and I have a lot of time and energy. Also I felt bad that there was no article on it on wikipedia and felt like an obligation to make something.--Clngre 12:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a comment about images - the image there is fair use and I'm pretty sure that it would be an obstacle for being a FA. It's okay right now but I think there would be an objection were you to apply (happened to me before on an article I submitted so I just removed an image). It might be worth your while to go digging through the Commons to see what you can find; even though a lot of images aren't strictly necessary it's good to have at least two, one for the top of the article itself and a different one that goes on the front of the main page the day it gets featured. Mithridates 14:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the comment. Yes, I was thinking about adding some other images, although I realize they would have to be of other gulags or prisoners. I'll get on that immediately. --Clngre 15:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, check it out now if you please. The middle section is still spare, so I'll look for some more images for it tongiht. --Clngre 16:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that looks good. That's enough images at present to be a FA though there's nothing wrong with a few more of course. The only other thing that stands out right now are a few red links (other uprisings in the see other section) but since you write so prolifically I assume you're going to write those too before nominating the article. Mithridates 17:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]