Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Would like to get feedback on how to improve the article. Specifically these areas:
- Is it neutral/fair
- Does it use good sources
I would like to see this one day become at least a Good Status article, although I'm not sure if there are enough high quality reliable sources for that.
Not sure what to categorize this article as, so I went with "General". Kent Hovind is a evangelist, but the article focuses on his fringe conspiracy and scientific theories. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)