| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have significantly expanded various sections, and would appreciate feedback on the additions I have made. Labyrinth's page was very thin on detail, and featured very few citations. I have added citations where I can, and created sections covering the different aspects of the film's production. I want to see if it can be upgraded on WikiProjectFilm's quality scale, as it is currently only Start Class and I feel the additions I have made mean it deserves a higher ranking. I'd appreciate thoughts on this, and if you agree it should be upgraded it would be good to have some idea of what grade you feel it should become.
Thanks, Rachael89 (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Lead needs to be expanded to at least 3-4 paragraphs.
- Plot section looks good, meets the WP:FILMPLOT criteria of 400-700 words.
- Production looks great as well, covers all aspects of the production
- Reception looks great as well, but box office section can be expanded upon.
- Home media release may need to be added as well.
- Hope these comments help. Thanks, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)