Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Seattle Kraken seasons/archive1

List of Seattle Kraken seasons

In approximately 4–5 months, I plan to make a good or featured topic about the Seattle Kraken, a topic that this list will be a part of. Since this list is very short, it cannot pass an FL nom (don't ask how I found out), so I'm doing a peer review instead. Feel free to leave comments. Thanks.

Thanks, XR228 (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

At this point, the article has been checked against the FL criteria, so I conside this peer review complete. XR228 (talk) 20:56, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Peer review

Howdy,

• In the intro I would introduce Dave Hakstol earlier, The team began play during the league's 2021–22 season and add on "with Dave Hakstol as their first coach." Somewhere it should be stated that they were an expansion team. * In the sentence finished eighth in their division with due to only having 60 points I would suggest something along the lines of "finished eighth in their division with only 60 points, not good enough to make the playoffs."
• In the sentence which was good for fourth in the Pacific Division and the first wild card spot in the Western Conference. I would add "good for fourth in the Pacific Division and the first playoff wild card spot in the Western Conference". Explains the importance of the wild card.
• An image of the Kraken logo, or a player with the Kraken logo visible would be a nice addition.
• NHL Season should read "NHL season"

Otherwise article is suitably cited and linked. Good job.Llammakey (talk) 18:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@Llammakey: I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I still believe you need to mention that the team was an expansion team somewhere, to explain why it only began playing in 2021-22 season and that it is not a relocation. Something along the lines of "The NHL awarded Seattle an expansion team in ..." Llammakey (talk) 16:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Llammakey: Fixed it. XR228 (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I made one small change, otherwise I consider the peer review closed if that is alright with you. I'm not sure if you'd like other people's opinions too. Llammakey (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Llammakey: I'd like another reviewer to review the article, just in case we both missed something. XR228 (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll ping @ChrisTheDude because he's good at doing FL reviews. XR228 (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)