Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Sonic the Hedgehog video games/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this list for peer review because I want to get feedback on how to improve this list before I take this to FLC. I plan to take this and the other relevant Sonic-related video game articles to GA or FA status so we can make the Sonic the Hedgehog games a good/featured topic.
Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments good long list!
- Lead is a little shallow for such a weighty list. I'd expect three reasonable-sizd paragraphs.
- I think if you feel there's a need to link the word eponymous, it's probably not worth using it.
- Sequel is a pretty common English term so needn't be linked, especially if you're not linking prequel.
- Similarly, I think most English readers will know what a hedgehog is.
- "as of November 2010" it's now January 2013, any update available?
- Why are there empty sections in the table? It looks odd, even if there are no notes for a specific title...
- Can you double check the template you're using for the video games table meets WP:ACCESS for MOS:DTT (i.e. row and col scopes for screen readers).
- The reflinks tool is showing a few issues that should be addressed.
- "2010 - (Ep. 1)" use en-dash for this sort of thing (per WP:DASH).
- "2012 - Onlive " ditto. There are others, so check for that.
- Be consistent with the way you link things. E.g. you link mobile phone in the "Other spin-offs" section the first time round, but you don't the second, third and fourth, then you link the fifth, sixth and seventh, but not the eighth.......
- Who publishes ref 45?
- Sonic Team is linked in ref 60 but not 58 and 59...
- And in ref 82, but not 83 to 88...
- Consistent date formats in the refs please.
- Check refs for violations of WP:DASH.
- Ref 115 needs to have format completed (e.g. publisher, accessdates etc etc).