Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coaches/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I would like to get this to FL status but I'm a little worried it might be too short for that. Obviously I'd to know if there is anything eles I need to fix too.

Thanks, Buc (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
  • Yes it's a little short but it doesn't mean it wouldn't stand a chance at FLC. It is, after all, comprehensive.
  • Of the 7 Buccaneers - seven.
  • You could specify (and link to) the precise Superbowl in the lead.
  • Probably ought to cite the claim that three coaches were former players and the firing claim too.
  • " This trade came after Dungy was fired after the Buccaneers has lost in the playoffs to the Eagles for the second year in a row and because it was determined that the offence Dungy ran was too inconsistent and he was unable to win in the playoffs." - too long, doesn't make sense to me (...has lost in the playoffs...?)
  • "dispite" typo.
  • Colour should not be the only way of identifying a property - see WP:COLOR. Use an asterisk, dagger etc to also denote coaches spending their entire career with the Bucs.
  • Footnotes and References can be merged into a single References section with your current Footnotes being "Specific" and your current References being "General".
  • What make JT-SW.com a reliable source?
  • Hickok Sports. or Hickok Sports.com?
  • Be consistent with the use of either work or publisher in the references.

That's about it. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Pinkkeith (talk · contribs)
  • I would add a content for references under the foot notes content. The bulleted list at the end are not foot notes, but references for the article.
  • Remove foot note five (Spent entire professional head coaching career with Buccaneers ). There is no reason to point this out since the table is already coded for this information.