Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by House/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get it to FLC eventually. The refs are not completely done so I am hoping for some comments on the content and format.
Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 04:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Image could use Alternative text. (see WP:ALT) Greatuser (t@lk)My edits 12:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I believe "List of accolades" is preferred to "List of awards and nominations"; I've certainly been asked to make that move in past FLCs.
- Don't see the point of adding the "within US" summary; other similar FLs don't segregate like this (here [[are List of accolades received by Miami Vice examples)
- The "Other US awards" table should probably use year as the primary sort. Out of interest, is there a particular cut-off point you're using to determine what gets a section and what doesn't? There are, for example, more TP de Oro awards than WGA ones.
- The images should probably be given the
|uprightcommand, it would help lessen the amount by which they're all bleeding into other headings. - The prose for each section should be expanded or omitted; just listing numbers makes it seem a little bitty. I tend to highlight the "bigger" awards when possible, noting who won when the subject lost (for example, "Directors Lee H. Katzin and Paul Michael Glaser both vied for 1985's Outstanding Directing for a Drama Series award, which was ultimately won by Karen Arthur for her work on Cagney & Lacey." from List of accolades received by Miami Vice#Emmy Awards).
- All those tables are going to need row and column scopes; the FLs I've linked to should give you examples of how that's done. GRAPPLE X 01:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Quick comment – Work on red links required, I think. Thanks, Zia Khan 15:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)