Wikipedia:Peer review/List of executions at Fremantle Prison/archive1

List of executions at Fremantle Prison

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to Featured List status, to be part of a Good/Featured Topic. Comments with regards to the featured list criteria would be appreciated. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 01:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lets take a look then shall we?

Done. The background information provided with the list is written up very professionally and it adheres to the guidelines to be considered for Featured list status. It features a few too many quotes though and it's history section seems too big to have the article classified as a list. I believe it's more suited to an article titled Executions at Fremantle Prison or something like that.
Done. The list features a very comprehensive lead section, which defined the scope and the inclusion criteria (Which I added in) fairly well.
Not Done. Although content does comply with 3a, 3b states it meets the requirement for a Stand-alone list, and the history section is too big. Perhaps just a really small paragraph and link the main article to Fremantle Prison?
Done. Contains section headings, is very easy to navigate due to it's small size and all content is under the appropriate section heading.
Not Done. The inline quotes give the list no visual appeal at all, otherwise no articles are redlinked and you have a succinct caption for your image.
Done. I don't see any edit wars, not changing significantly now (except in response to the process of list this as FL-class)

All up, a little bit of trimming and you can start processing this list for FL Class. Good Luck, Aneditor (talk tome) 20:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

a few too many quotes – reduced to only two quotations
history section seems too big – I don't know of any guidance for when a stand-alone list with introductory text should be reclassified as a prose article, but there are several FLs with a lot of prose, sometimes in multiple sections, such as List of National Treasures of Japan (archaeological materials), List of Interstate Highways in Michigan, List of Danish football champions, and Moons of Saturn
inclusion criteria (Which I added in) – thank you
awaits conclusion – I'll leave it open for now and see if anyone else would like to comment - Evad37 [talk] 01:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]