Wikipedia:Peer review/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2000/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to receive feedback to complete this list in the most acurate way posible. Note: When I sent the list for the 1999 number-one albums to the FL reviewer they asked to choose between the rowspan or the sortable, and I choose the rowspan.
Thanks, Jaespinoza (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
- Nice to see how these have improved - not too much to comment on that has not been addressed already, so most of this will be nit-picky. Since Latin is capitalized in the title, should it be chart that features Latin music information? FIXED
- Needs a copyedit too - The number-one albums of 2000, according to this chart were eleven ... could be simpler, just say There were eleven number-one albums on this chart in 2000... FIXED
- Nationalities are generally capitalized (Colombian, Guatemalan). Why is Guatemalan not linked? Also why do some artists have nationalities given but others (Gloria Estefan) do not? FIXED
- Watch overlinking - singer-songwriter is linked twice in the lead at least. FIXED
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)