Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch articleWatch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it was recently created from the Savannah, Georgia article. The goal is to improve it to Featured List status.

Thanks,

Absolon S. Kent (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]



  • Try to remove some of the dead, unused whitespace between some of the tables. --   Done
  • The 'incomplete list' template should appear at the very top, before the lead. It looks a bit awkward crammed in there between the lead & the TOC. --   Done
  • The lead is too short. It doesn't really introduce the topic, or establish any standards of notability for inclusion in this list. You might want to expand the lead by tying some of the more notability people to the city better; talk about some of the most notable people, and how they contributed to the city's culture. --   Done
  • Get rid of the 'Other notable Savannah people articles' template in the top right. You can put those three items in a short list under a 'see also' section at the end. --   Done
  • Some of the descriptions in the notability column are very brief, and should be expanded. You don't want to make it too long, though, because readers can click on the link to read the full bio. But you want to say more about someone's notability than simple 'actor' or 'NFL player'. --   Done

Dr. Cash (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]