Wikipedia:Peer review/Lover (album)/archive1

Lover (album)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to take it to FAC. Because this article is quite long, I'd appreciate any comments that point out potential prose, MOS, file... issues.

Thanks, Ippantekina (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

I am uncertain if I will have time to commit to full a review, but I wanted to comment on the article's use of audio samples. From my understanding, audio samples should only be used in an album article if they are representative of something in the album as a whole. "The Archer" sample does this very well, but the "Lover" and "Paper Rings" samples are more about the individual songs and less about the album. I would either revise these captions to more better justify their inclusion in this article (i.e. how do they represent something about the album as a whole that cannot be conveyed with just prose) or remove them completely in favor of something else. Aoba47 (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: to ensure that they saw the above comments. Z1720 (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the nominator has not responded to the comments, I am going to close this PR. Another one can be opened if an editor wants additional comments. Z1720 (talk) 21:27, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]