Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, I would like to make it Good Article standard and would like some oppinions and feedback of other users before I start work on the article.
Thanks, –LiamTaylor– 22:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Comments from Canada Hky (talk · contribs)
edit- Comments from my experience getting some hockey and (gridiron) football articles to GA status. Canada Hky (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Typically, if the fact is cited in the body of the article, the inline citations aren't needed in the lead.The lead is a bit short to adequately summarize the material in the rest of the article. The info about his nickname could probably be omitted in favour of a more thorough summary of his career.The "cramped lifestyle" makes it sound like it refers only to Balotelli, presumably it refers to the way his family lived.The comment about his biological parents "glory hunting" seems to come out of nowhere, because there is no mention of his parents wanting him back. A bit of context, or reorganization might help.Lots of football jargon - "senior side", "set-piece", "penalty" (presumably kick), etc.In the Style of play section, the part about "petulant attitude" probably needs a direct cite.Having inline cites in numerical order cleans things up a lot.The dead links in the references should be cleaned up / replaced if possible.
- This isn't an exhaustive list, just some things to get you started. The article could probably do with a thorough copyedit and some polishing before GA / FA. Interesting read, though. :) Canada Hky (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Iv'e done all your points. Thanks mate, your comments helped, much apprieciated. –LiamTaylor– 11:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)