| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because when I came across it is was a complete mess. I suspect large parts of it were written by a paid editor given that it read like an advertisement. The article was also largely without citations. I have gone through and tried to cite what I thought was necessary and remove the PR language. Given the amount of time I've spent on this article I'm hoping to eventually have it become a Good Article. I would love any thoughts about it.
Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)